|
AMELIA EARHART,
The Mystery Solved.
Written by Elgen and?Marie Long.
Simon and Schuster publishers, 1999.
Critique by Rollin C Reineck
Elgin Long concludes that Amelia Earhart ran out of fuel 20 hours and 34 minutes after she departed Lae, New Guinea, and ditched her airplane within 52 miles of Howland Island.
In his book, Long distorts some facts and introduces false assumptions to support his conclusions.
Long contends that Earhart used more fuel than she had on board and ditched before she found Howland Island because she flew faster than planned to compensate for strong head winds. Long says, "The stronger the head wind the faster the plane must fly for maximum range." The basis for this, Long says, is that for every head wind component there is a recommended speed for maximum range. However, increased speed means increased fuel consumption.
Fortunately, Earhart was not taught this modern day concept of cruise control for maximum range. Earhart was taught (as were all pilots during WW II and years afterwards) that for maximum range the wing of the airplane must be in an attitude that will give maximum lift and minimum drag. This meant that there was an optimum speed to fly the airplane that would put the wing in that attitude. For Earhart, Lockheed told her to fly the airplane at 150 MPH TRUE AIR SPEED. (indicated air speed --what you read on the dial-- corrected for air density) for maximum range, regardless of winds. If the forecast winds were too strong, postpone the flight.
Long states in the PREFACE that the recent discovery of lost documents --THE CHATER REPORT-- has enabled him to solve the mystery of Amelia Earhart's disappearance. Then he goes on to say that the radio transmissions, as found in the CHATER REPORT, "were not altered or shaded to change their original meaning." Further, he took care not to inject "poetic license".
Let's see if Long adheres to his principles.
The following are radio communications between Earhart and the Lae radio operator after Earhart took-off from Lae, New Guinea, at 10:00 hours, local Lae time which was 00:00 GCT. These radio communications are cited from the
CHATER REPORT.
1. At 2:18 PM, (04:18 GCT. - 4 hrs, 18 min. after take-off) Earhart reported: HEIGHT 7000 FEET. SPEED 140 KNOTS. UNINTELLIGIBLE REMARK, EVERYTHING OKAY.
It should be noted that Earhart's (pilot's compartment) air-speed indicator was not calibrated in knots, but in miles per hour. Accordingly, it seems logical that Noonan provided her with the figure "140 knots" and obviously meant it as GROUND SPEED. The bottom line for a navigator is COURSE and GROUND SPEED. They work in nautical mile, not statute miles. The conversion factor is 1.15. Long states that the 140 KNOTS (161 MPH) reported by Earhart was not her ground speed, but her true air speed (true air speed is indicated air speed corrected for air density).
However, Long knows, as well as all pilots know, that when you give a position, you report the speed you are making over the ground, or GROUND SPEED, not TRUE AIR SPEED. Long (page 17) follows by saying "At four hours and eighteen minutes into the flight they were already experiencing stronger head winds than anticipated. The stronger winds had made them recalculate their optimum speed" (for maximum range).
Long's interpretation of the 0418 GCT message is totally wrong. Unfortunately it is this mistake is this mistake that is the foundation of the Long theory.
What Earhart says is she is at 7000 feet and her speed is 140 KNOTS. It is more than obvious that Earhart is talking about GROUND SPEED when she says 140 KNOTS, not TRUE AIR SPEED as Long would like you to believe. This means that instead of a head-wind, Earhart had a tail wind component for that period of the flight, which would be quite normal and expected flying in the intertropical convergence zone where winds tend to vary.
Long confirms his view on page 17 (bottom of page) "Noonan had navigated perfectly so far, they were exactly on course. A TRUE AIR SPEED of 161 MPH reduced by a 23 KNOT wind (26.5 MPH) would give them a GROUND SPEED of 134.5 MPH." (See page 4 re the 23 knot wind). Page 18, last paragraph Long says that if she maintains that TRUE AIR SPEED, fuel consumption will be excessive and she will have little if any fuel remaining when she arrives at Howland.
To prove his point about fuel consumption, Long, on page 251, prints a fuel analysis and says that Lockheed is the source citing a telegram March 11 and 13, 1937 regarding Earhart's California to Hawaii flight.
However, Long is misquoting the facts. The information that Lockheed (Johnson) sent to Earhart on those dates is as follows:
Alt Time
RPM Man/Pres Fuel/Hour
8000 1 hr
2050 28½ in 100 US gal.
8000 3 hr
1900 28 in 60 US gal
8000 3 hr
1800 26½ in 51 US gal
8000 3 hr
1700 25 in 43 US gal
10,000 thereafter
1600 24 in 38 US gal
The power settings provided to Earhart would have given her a TRUE AIR SPEED of approximately 150 MPH. Using these power settings she could fly for approximately 24 hours and 10 minutes regardless of the wind. As the reader has noted, the power settings above are not the same as the power setting that appear in the Long book on page 251. Long has changed the power settings to strengthen his argument that Earhart used more fuel.
Long also contends that the airplane was much heavier at Lae than it was at Oakland, therefore, the power settings had to be increased.
But, that's not true.
When Earhart left Oakland on 17 March 1937, there were four people on board, each with personal luggage and parachutes. Also there was equipment and spare parts. In addition there was a trailing wire antenna with its motorized retrieval mechanism, 250 feet of wire and a lead weight in the rear of the plane. She had 947 gallons of fuel on board for take-off.
At Lae, there were only two people on board, no parachutes, and only enough personal things "to be decent". Earhart and Noonan both discarded all unnecessary parts/equipment and personal belongings including books, charts, and even a hand gun. The trailing wire antenna and the motorized retrieval unit had been left in Miami.
There was 1100 (1092) gallons of fuel on board at take-off at Lae. This equates to 145 gallons more fuel at Lae than at Oakland. At six pounds per gallon this would equal 870 more pounds of fuel. However, because of the passenger load, parts and equipment, trailing wire antenna etc., the plane weighed only about 250/300 pounds more at Lae than at Oakland. Not enough difference to increase the power settings that were given to Earhart by Lockheed in March 1937.
2. At 3:19 PM, (05:19 GCT, - 5 hrs, 19 min. after take-off) Earhart reported: HEIGHT 10000
FEET, POSITION 150.7 EAST, 7.3 SOUTH. CUMULUS CLOUDS, EVERYTHING OKAY
Long states that this is "definitely NOT their position at 05:19 GCT". He believes it was their position at 02:00 GCT as it was customary for mariners to give a noon position.
3. At 5:18 PM, (0718 GCT, - 7 hrs, 18 min. after take-off) Earhart reported: POSITION 4.33
SOUTH, 159.7 EAST. HEIGHT 8000 FEET OVER CUMULUS CLOUDS, WIND 23 KNOTS.
(23 knots is ?26.5 mph).
Again it is the navigator (Noonan) talking when Earhart gives the wind in knots. Doubtlessly a tail wind component that gave them the ground speed of 140 knots (161 mph). Long says the
geographical position is NOT where Earhart was at the time of the report, but he doesn't know why. Although, Earhart gave NO DIRECTION for the wind, Long says it was a HEAD WIND of 26.5 MPH.
How does Long know that? He doesn't say.
The big question here is, DID LONG ADHERE TO HIS PRINCIPLES OF NOT ALTERING OR SHADING the radio transmissions as found in the CHATER REPORT?
He changed GROUND SPEED to TRUE AIR SPEED. He said a wind reported was from a CERTAIN DIRECTION when in fact, the radio communication DID NOT GIVE ANY DIRECTION.
Long says that Earhart was NOT where she reported to be in two position reports that were given in the CHATER REPORT. Is this shading or is this deliberately changing the radio transmissions of the CHATER REPORT to support the author's position?
Now, let's turn to another assumption that is presented in the Long book. This assumption by Long says that Howland Island was mis-plotted. Long claims that Howland Island was actually six miles east of the plotted position on the charts that Noonan used and Noonan was unaware of the true position of Howland Island.
Long is totally wrong.
In August of 1936, the Coast Guard vessel, the Itasca accurately plotted the Line Islands including Howland. It found that Howland was plotted 5½ miles west of its real position. Long would like one to believe that this information was CLASSIFIED and therefore not available to Earhart for her Pacific flight.
Ask yourself this question. If this island had been mis-plotted it would have been a hazard to navigation. The United States was not at war at that time and had no declared enemies, therefore why would it be classified?
There is no doubt that this information was made available to all mariners (Notice to Mariners) world-wide. It is inconceivable that Noonan would not have received the information that was discovered almost a year before the Earhart flight. The Coast Guard was fully aware of Earhart's plans to fly around the world and to use Howland Island as a refueling stop. They were charged with providing whatever help they could to make the Earhart flight a success. Withholding such vital information is incomprehensible.
In a recent book about Amelia Earhart titled EAST TO THE DAWN, Page 408 the author discusses this very point. Ms Butler says "The chart of the area then in use #1198, Published by the hydrographic office within the Navy, contrary to the assertion that it showed Howland Island wrongly placed, in fact was reasonably accurate. According to the last chart correction made by
the U.S. Government dating from 1995, the coordinates to the beacon on the west side of Howland are: latitude 00 degrees 48 minutes north. longitude, 176 degrees 37 minutes west. The chart Fred was using showed Howland within half a mile of those coordinates. When years later, emulating Amelia's world flight, Ann Pellegreno used the latitude and longitude that Fred Noonan had used for Howland. She found they were correct."
Another erroneous assumption Long makes is that Noonan could "readily take additional celestial fixes if he needed or wanted them" even though Earhart was reporting partly cloudy weather conditions.
There are only certain stars that can be used by a navigator to determine his position. The trick is to find those select stars. First, the star must be in the sky where you are flying. For instance, one can't see the north star if he is at the equator, nor can he see the southern cross if he is in the northern latitudes. Secondly, the navigator must identify the star by associating it with its
constellation. As an example, the Big Dipper points to Arcturus. Without the Big Dipper, finding and properly identifying Arcturus is almost impossible. This same rationale would apply to any other star.
It must be remembered that when Earhart left Miami, one of the windows that was to be used for celestial observations, had been covered over with aluminum. This meant that only the left window in the rear of the airplane was distortion free for celestial observations. When that limitation is coupled with partially cloudy conditions as reported by Earhart, taking any star shots would have been problematical at best. Noonan would have been very fortunate indeed, if he had been able to obtain any celestial observations before dawn.
Long says that at early dawn, "Noonan could have easily fixed their position by taking celestial observations of the sun?and the moon." Most people are aware that the sun and the moon both rise in the east and set in the west. Even though both celestial bodies might have been observed by Noonan, he would have ended up with two parallel lines, not a fix.
Because of the partly cloudy conditions at night and the lack of adequate working conditions within the airplane for celestial navigation, it is very unlikely that Noonan was aware of his position at dawn within 75 miles. Accordingly, if he followed the standard navigational procedures, he would have made at least a 15 degree off-set correction to the left when they were about 100 miles out. This correction was made to insure that he knew which side of Howland Island he was on when he started on his final sunline course of 157 degrees.
Long is correct when he says that the sun shots taken by Noonan in the early morning hours would have provided a line of position with a 10 mile accuracy. However, Noonan had no idea where he was on that sunline. He could easily have been 200 miles northwest of Howland.
When they made the right turn to a course of 157 degrees, Noonan and Earhart were both unaware how far they were from Howland Island. When the island didn't appear in a reasonable time and no radio communications were received, they did the only thing that reasonable flyers would have done, they headed toward the Marshall Islands where there were some 1100 atolls and small islands to provide a safe haven. (There is evidence that they turned north when they couldn't find Howland Island).
But what about the fuel?
Long, by changing certain facts, using poor information and bad assumptions would have the reader believe that Earhart ran out of gas some 20 hours and 32 minutes after she left Lae, New Guinea.
The truth is that Earhart, maintaining a true airspeed of 150 MPH and using the power settings provided her by Lockheed, had over 24 hours of flying time ahead of her. When she called in at 1912 GCT, she had flown approximately 2556 miles at an average ground speed of 133 MPH. Maintaining a true airspeed of 150 MPH would mean that she had encountered an average head wind of 17 MPH.
At 2014, Earhart, in her last message said we are "running north and south". At that time it can be reasonably assumed that she departed the Howland Island area and headed for the Marshall Islands. She would have had approximately 4 hours of fuel remaining. Using maximum range true airspeed of 150 MPH and a tail wind of 17 MPH she would have been able to travel some 680 miles.
Would it be enough to get her to the Marshall Islands?
Yes, it is this writer's belief that she did make it to Mili Atoll, the closest atoll in the Marshalls to Howland.
To believe the Long theory, then the researcher must disregard all other credible evidence such as, what Bilaman Amaron saw and did at Jaluit and what the Heine boys saw. What Oliver Knaggs found at Mili Atoll and what the Weihsien message tells us. Also the researcher must disregard all evidence that Earhart was on Saipan.
END
--+--
|