|
My name is Barbara Rubin and I have been chemically injured by pesticides. I was sensitized in my early adult years to chemicals, most likely from both acute and chronic exposures to Dursban imposed upon me by landlords and employers. Once the reason for my recurring health problems became clear in 1990, I managed to live and work productively through avoidance of further exposures. Accommodation plans were drafted with employers and landlords.
In 1999, I supervised a school for developmentally disabled children under the auspices of a large, not-for-profit agency. I had a written accommodation plan which assured me I would not be exposed to pesticides without my knowledge and that I was permitted to avoid contact with the chemicals if used in my vicinity. The company did not keep its word and I was exposed (as were all in the school) to recurrent applications of neurotoxic pyrethroid insecticides performed after school hours without my knowledge. After six months of exposure I was left brain damaged and unable to perform even routine tasks with my prior levels of skill. An MRI exam indicated cortical atrophy while neuropsychological evaluation estimated a 24 point loss in IQ with deficits across the board in linguistic, cognitive and sensori-motor functioning. My career as a speech-language pathologist and school administrator was ended.
A residential pesticide exposure was later imposed upon me the following year by new tenants living below my second floor apartment. They violated their agreement not to use pesticides without advance notification. Dichlorvos fumes, entering my apartment through the floorboards, left me so ill that the majority of my days are still spent in bed, resting and trying to maintain strict avoidance of toxic chemicals. All of my possessions were contaminated and had to be discarded; library, furnishings, clothing, electronics etc. The cumulative effects of all these exposures have been devastating to myself and my family.
All incidents were reported to the EPA who informed me that insofar as the chemicals used were registered, they were not interested in investigating the blatant misuse of these poisons. They suggested I litigate these matters privately, given the prior agreements that such exposures would not occur. They were indifferent to the fact that routine applications of chemicals, approved for use by their agency, can cause such horrendous health effects. This is a violation of all rational thought and moral responsibility. |