Update, 3-9-2000:
FUEL SYSTEM CHANGED:
After running into problems with the electric fuel pump originally planned, I have changed the fuel system.
I am currently blueprinting a more traditional steam car fuel system, similar to the proven Stanley fuel system. My new fuel system uses a special type of hermetically-sealed diaphragm fuel pump to pump fuel into a small fuel pressure tank. The fuel pressure tank allows the burner to run a considerable time (as when warming up from cold) without running the fuel pump, and allows a simpler fuel pump, driven by the direct-drive engine. The fuel pressure tank is simply a rugged compressed air tank of the portable type (1-2 gallons), with fuel in its bottom kept at 80 psi by compressed air above it in the top of the tank. Similar pressure tanks are used in water systems for homes with their own water wells and pumps.
These fuel pressure tanks have one problem: the fuel absorbs the compressed air over time, which reduces the amount of fuel the tank can deliver. In old-time steam cars, like Stanleys, this means adding compressed air at intervals. This is fun for antique steam car hobbyists, but is an unacceptable hassle for modern automobile drivers, so I looked for a way to eliminate the need for compressed air refills.
At first I planned to enclose the air in a gas-impermeable flexible bladder to physically separate the air from the fuel. The air bladder idea had all kinds of construction and materials problems, however, so I invented a simple automatic device, a tiny diaphragm air pump and special regulator, to eliminate both the bladder and air refills and to automatically keep the right amount of compressed air in the fuel pressure tank at all times. It is much simpler and easier to build than it sounds.
The fuel flow from the fuel pump to the fuel pressure tank is controlled by a simple fuel bypass valve. When the tank is at full pressure, any additional fuel from the fuel pump is automatically bypassed back to the nonpressurized main fuel tank. This wastes some horsepower, but the volume of fuel pumped is so small that the loss is minimal -- on the order of 1/50 hp!
Another automatic valve shuts off the fuel flow from pressure tank to pilot light and burner when the fuel pressure drops below a preset level, around 60 psi. This prevents loss of air from the pressure tank, and leaves enough fuel in the pressure tank for warmup from cold, in case the car is left standing with the pilot on for more than a week (a rare occurrence).
Both of these valves are located inside the fuel tank for extra safety in case of diaphragm or fitting failure. Such failure is very unlikely, but I believe in designing according to Murphy's Law: "anything that can go wrong, eventually will go wrong".
In case of leaks or other problems (Murphy's Law again!), a hand-operated pump is provided, which pumps fuel, air, and water simultaneously from a single hand lever. This sounds primitive, but is actually much less of a hassle than jump-starting a drained or dead battery, and would be necessary less often than jump-starts in gas cars in real-world operation (we have all accidentally left our headlights on overnight!). If the car is properly maintained and used regularly, the hand pump lever might never be used.
I have designed the valves to be multi-function, so overall this fuel system would be simpler than those in classic steam cars, and it would be as fully automatic and convenient as the fuel systems in modern gas cars. Overall complexity is only slightly more than that of a modern gas car's fuel-injection system, and I think the cost would be much less when the modern gas car's fuel-control electronics are factored in. My steam car's greater mechanical simplicity elsewhere more than makes up for the few extra bits in the fuel system.
All moving parts of the fuel system are hermetically sealed with reinforced neoprene diaphragms, for safety, durability, and economy, and to eliminate fuel vapor emissions.
A standard activated-charcoal vapor recovery cannister, vented to the burner via a flame arrestor fitting, keeps the main fuel tank at atmospheric pressure while safely and cleanly burning any fuel vapors which might otherwise escape. When the pilot light is shut off, a diaphragm valve closes the vent line to prevent fuel vapor escape. These simple, inexpensive features are necessary in any modern car using gasoline for fuel.
This fuel system eliminates many difficult design/construction tasks, eliminates many potentially costly and troublesome components, and allows clean burning and steady firing without pressure pulses in the fuel supply. It also allows an instantly, precisely, and continuously variable firing rate, which simplifies accurate control of steam pressure and temperature in a lightweight steam generator.
FEEDWATER CONTROL CHANGE:
I have also replaced the solenoid-disengaged inlet valves in the water pumps with a low-restriction, on-off feed water bypass valve to control water feed to the boiler. My new feed water automatic valve works on the same principle as the piloted diaphragm water valves in washing machines, allowing high-pressure valve control with minimal mechanical force input.
The main problem with the previously-planned solenoid-disengaged water pump inlet valves is that the required steel ball valves would be prone to corrosion and leakage and harder to make quiet-running. With a mechanical bypass valve downline from the water pumps, non-pitting nylon ball check valves with o-ring seats can be used in the pumps, eliminating corrosion, leakage, and noise.
--------------------------------
(Inserted Update, 5-29-2000)
Another problem with the solenoid valves is that they only give on-off control. This led to design difficulties in regulating the water flow to the boiler under some operating conditions. With the variable-opening feedwater bypass valve, the amount of water "leaked" out of the feedwater line (instead of being passed on to the boiler) can be precisely varied, which makes the water control system much easier to design for stable steam temperature.
Bypass type feedwater systems are relatively inefficient, as they consume their full horsepower at any given speed no matter how much water is actually delivered to the boiler (which is determined by load). However, if the pump plungers are carefully sized, they can deliver enough water for any given load/speed within the system's range, while consuming well under 10% of the developed engine horsepower -- an acceptable loss.
By analyzing the problem, I have discovered that very small changes in pump plunger diameter can have dramatic overall powerplant efficiency results with bypass type feedwater control systems. Careful design is extremely important. Another eye-opening design learning experience!
It is possible to reduce pump horsepower loss, but this requires variable-displacement pumps, whose design difficulty, cost, and complexity are too high to justify the small horsepower savings. While researching this, I designed several types of variable-displacement feedwater pumps.
(end inserted update of 5-29-2000)
-----------------------------
(3-9-2000 Update, continued)
Thus the fuel and water controls are now entirely non-electric in operation, and in a pinch the car will run perfectly with a dead battery or no battery at all!
I am currently dimensioning the fuel system components, and all parts look pretty easy to make in the home shop, with minimal labor and tooling requirements and low-cost materials. Some of the valves are available off the shelf, but buying them would be substantially more expensive than building them. I am finding that designing components to combine low cost and easy buildability with safety and reliability in service is much more difficult than simply designing something that works! |