TROS
(Dec 28, 2004)
This is astonishingly good, and not at all what I had expected. The story of a adventurous sailor from a Greek island who challenges Caesar's first attempt at invading the British Isles, TROS does have a couple of vividly described battle scenes and some climactic action at sea, but that's not what the story is mostly about. It's essentially a political thriller. Nearly all the book is concerned with forming alliances, telling trustworthy friends from treacherous rogues, making deals and manipulating people without their quite catching on. (If the book were written today, it would probably be about a diplomat trying to navigate the snakefights in the Middle East just before another war erupts.) Mundy is absolutely wonderful at this sort of narrative, something I first experienced with a pair of the Jimgrim novels. His heroes are perfectly capable of cutting your head off but they would rather talk you into doing what they want instead. (If that fails, THEN they can always cut off your head.)
It's 55 B.C., and Julius Caesar has subjugated Gaul to his satisfaction and is turning predatory eyes toward Britain. (In addition to the usual source of slaves and goods to be taken, the Isles have tin, needed for making bronze.) The Britons are ferocious but unorganized warriors, who scorn armor as unmanly and who tend to fight as the mood strikes them. Against the highly disciplined, Storm Trooper-like Romans, they don't really seem to have a good chance of resisting successfully.
Then Tros of Samothrace appears as an unwilling emissary of Rome. Tros' father, Prince Perseus (not THE Perseus of course, perhaps a descendant) is a prisoner of Caesar, held hostage to make Tros follow orders. Even as he meets with the British king Caswallon (another real historical figure) and Queen Fflur, though, Tros is feverishly scheming how to arrange the defense of Britain, the rescue of his father and the defeat of Caesar. Quite a lot to accomplish, but Tros is not your ordinary sailor.
There are some interesting aspects of these stories that pleasantly startled me. Talbot Mundy was a writer with a deep and sincere interest in the occult and mysticism. He comes down squarely on the side of the Druids, shows them as wise and holy men with great Knowledge, and dismisses the tales of their burning sacrifices in wicker men as mere Roman propaganda. (I don't know the historic truth of the matter, and I'm not sure anyone really does; you can find sources claiming either side is true, and the whole subject is mired in a huge swamp of New Age revisionism.)
Tros himself is complex and a bit ambiguous. Of course, to command an unruly and untrustworthy crew into sailing the ocean, much less taking on Roman forces, he has to be absolutely hard and imposing. ("Thereafter, disdaining to draw his sword on fishermen, he seized a wooden bench and cracked a skull or two with that, until the bench broke and the Britons began to admire him.")
At the same time, though, he is a novice in the Mystery religions of that time, and has some aversion to taking human life. At one point, he boards another ship and throws its crew overboard in the sea but insists he has done nothing wrong and certainly has not placed any murders on his soul. ("I gave them leave to swim... That is their affair. I never forbade them to learn to swim.") It sure sounds like he's rationalizing like crazy, here.
Tros is not a full initiate into the Mysteries like his father, which would mean taking vows of non-violence and shunning revenge. So he's kind of straddling the reality of wars and invasions with the spiritual duties of peaceful resistance. It makes him a lot more appealing than most of Robert E Howard's heroes, who could murder a dozen men over a purse of gold and sleep soundly that night. (Howard was deeply influenced by Talbot Mundy, but although he excelled on his own turf of all-out kinetic action, he never came close to making his battle scenes as convincing or well thought out as Mundy did.)
Another thing that struck me was how demonic and despicable Mundy's depiction of Julius Caesar is. Now, intellectually of course, I realized that the man was a conqueror and that means he committed untold atrocities, tortures and betrayals to achieve his ends. (There are no honorable conquests, although maybe it may seem so if you're on the side that benefits.) Still, it never sank in before what an absolute monster he must have been until I read this book. Mundy's version of Caesar is the most cunning and clever military leader alive at that time but also one with no honor or decency at all. I had vaguely idealized and cleaned-up images of a dignified Caesar from schoolbook texts, but I think it's time to read a bit more about him in depth.
Mundy likes the ancient Britons well enough, but he has no illusions about them and shows them with their flaws as well as their heroism. The minute details showing how people lived and acted in those times don't seem forced here. Some adventure writers all too obviously read a few encyclopedia entries or NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC articles, made a few notes and then clumsily inserted foreign words and phrases here and there into the narrative (I'm not mentioning Edgar Rice Burroughs specifically, you understand). Talbot Mundy on the other hand writes with a confidence and a surety that convinces me he really knew his subject in depth. His descriptions of the difficulties and hardships of sailing have the ring of authenticity, the same as his relating how chariots were managed on headlong gallops through deep woods.
Most of the time, all the intricate scheming and plotting between the characters was more than enough to keep the pages turning smoothly, but I have to admit that once or twice, I did find myself wishing that something physical would happen. Maybe a lifetime of reading the violent and lightning-quick tempo of most pulp series has ruined me for finer literature, just as my teachers warned me it would. Mundy does work at a more deliberate and natural pacing, much like a mainstream historical novel. You just have to settle down, relax and enjoy the story on its own terms. It's denser and more thorough than a typical pulp you can breeze through at top speed.
I do love the sly bits of humour Mundy always inserts into his narratives. It's seldom broad slapstick, more like Tros' reflections on the use of torture ("Tortures such as Caesar had inflicted flay away personal values and leave nothing in the thought but sheer fact, which was why courts applied torture to witnesses. If they had tortured the judges, too, there might have been some sense in it.") There is a scene where Tros has to question an old old toothless man about navigating the coasts of Britain, and because he can't make any sense of the elder's mumbling, the man's blind assistant has to interpret. ("They vied in their enthusiasm to explain to him, clutching him, striking each other's wrists, interrupting each other, croaking and squeaking like a pair of rusty-throated parrots, answering his questions both at once and abusing each other when he failed to understand exactly..." The book is filled with amusing little moments like that.)
TROS has a large cast, and none of them are simple black & white heroes or villains (except maybe Caesar, of course). They each have their own agendas, which sometimes agree with Tros' plans and sometimes don't. Even when you as a reader don't like what a character is up to, you can understand his point of view. Fflur, the queen who is equally at home commanding a warship or supervising the washing of the dishes after a feast, is especially impressive when 'the sight" comes upon and she prophesies in an eerie distant voice. Of course, now I have to read the rest of the stories to see how her foretellings come out. (Not exactly a chore.)
Talbot Mundy had nine Tros stories published in ADVENTURE, all revised into one whopper of a book, TROS OF SAMOTHRACE in 1934. The first two stories, "Tros of Samothrace" (February 1925) and "The Enemy of Rome" (April 1925) were reprinted by Avon Books in 1967 as simply TROS. The remaining stories were collected in later Avon paperbacks titled HELMA, LIAFAIL and HELENE (I'll be reviewing them in due time) and Tros also appeared in the 1929 book QUEEN CLEOPATRA. (One of Mundy's most appealing traits is that his characters popped up in each others' stories exactly as if they were real people bumping into one another. The Jimgrim stories feature maybe a dozen protagonists who show up in different combinations, something irresistable to a crossover enthusiast like myself).
|